The implant companies have various warranty programs for ruptures and capsular contractors. Some you have to pay for and others you do not. You have to check with each manufacturer as it varies.

Yes, you can move your arms after a breast augmentation. However, I tell my patients to avoid heavy lifting or upper body exercises for about 6 weeks after surgery.

Sometimes implants can cause pain years later. This is most commonly due to a capsular contracture or scar tissue around the implant.

It is difficult to predict whether or not an individual will be able to breast feed after augmentation. Some women who are very small breasted to begin with can produce a lot of milk, while some very large breasted women cannot. Inevitably during surgery some of the parenchyma is divided to create the pocket for implant placement. However, there are many patients who can breast feed. Again, this depends upon the individual patient.

Breast implants may last 30 or more years, but many will likely need additional surgery to replace their implants at least once or twice in their lifetime.

There are no definitive studies in the literature that I know of that prove that breast implants cause autoimmune disorders.

Yes, can fat be transferred to the breasts for augmentation. It is not my preferred method for primary augmentation but I offer it to patients as an alternative to implants.

Breasts may sag a bit with time as the body undergoes changes as one ages. The heavier the implant, the more likely this could happen.

No, there is no specific time for implants to be replaced. If there is no evidence of a leak, rupture, capsular contracture, or displacement then you do not need further surgery.

A 300 cc implant weighs about 0.66 lbs so two implants of this size is about 1.32 lbs. So, yes, you might gain a little weight with implants.

Every surgeon is a bit different, but what I suggest to my patients is to eat healthy and stay fit and avoid medications and herbal supplements that might cause bleeding.

Insurance does not cover cosmetic surgery. If an implant is needed for breast reconstruction then this is usually covered by insurance.

A capsular contracture usually presents with a noticeable distortion of the breast and may cause pain.

In general, breast implant surgery is very safe with a very low risk of complications.

The breast augmentation incision usually is not painful. If the scar becomes sore, it may not be healing properly and may require attention with special tapes or possibly steroids injections.

Breast implants may last 30 or more years, but many will likely need additional surgery to replace their implants at least once or twice in their lifetime. There is no specific time for implants to be replaced. If there is no evidence of a leak, rupture, rippling, capsular contracture, or displacement then you do not need further surgery.

In my practice, I can not recall a single patient that ever wished that they did not have implant surgery. The majority are extremely happy to have had it done.

The fee for breast augmentation will vary from doctor to doctor. In NYC the fee can run from about $8-15K.

An alternative to having a breast augmentation with implants would be using your own fat to augment the breast.

In general, most of my patients are pretty sore for a few days, but usually within a week they are feeling a lot better.

Cohesive gel implants are often referred to gummy bear type implants, They are a semi-solid gel that if cut in half will stay intact.

There is no breast enlargement technique that I know of that can be performed without surgery.

Gummy bear implants are implants that are made of a semi-solid type of silicone that when you cut it inhale the silicone stays intact.

Natrelle implants are a proprietary name of a gummy type silicone implant that is produced by Allergan.

I think that will vary from practice to practice. I find that most of my patients chose somewhere between 300-450 ccs per side as the most common volume.

The most common complications include deflation, capsular contracture, displacement, infection, and hematoma.

In my opinion, there is no one safest breast implant that I know of.

I think that the average price for a breast augmentation in NYC is between $8k-15K.

Insurance companies in general do not cover cosmetic breast surgery.

Breast augmentation and breast implant surgery are the same.

Many patients who have sagging breasts come into the office desiring breast implants thinking that adding volume to the breasts may also lift them. However, implants mainly add volume. They do not lift the breasts to any significant degree. The nipple areola complex will often stay close to the same position as where it started. If a patient has sagging breast tissue and the nipple areola complex is low, then a formal lift is most likely required. There are patients that can benefit from a breast augmentation and only need a small lift of the nipple areola complex. In those cases, I often do a circumareoolar lift, or what some refer to as a doughnut mastopexy. It is a nice procedure that can help balance asymmetries for some women, but again it has to be for the right indications. More formal lifts may employ a lollipop incision often using a vertical pedicle, or in those patients with a lot of loose skin, an inverted T or anchor incision is used. It is definitely tailored to the different individuals needs and discussed at the time of consultation.

In order to determine if a patient is a good candidate for a breast augmentation, they would need to be seen in the office and have a formal physical examination. During the exam, I want to learn about the goals of my patient to determine what size implant might be appropriate for her. We discuss the different options including shapes, sizes, textures, and contours of the various implants. Discussion of the various differences between saline and silicone implants are discussed as well. We review pocket placement, incision design, and various nuances based upon an individual’s anatomy. Most commonly, patients come in with hypomastia, or in lay terms small breasts, and desire larger breasts. This is common in the younger patient in their early 20’s. I also see many women who have had children and their breasts have changed and sometimes become involuted. They commonly want more volume to restore the breasts as they looked prior to pregnancies. This is often in patients in their 30’s and early 40’s. But I have seen women who are older that want larger breasts as well.

I think that deciding to undergo a surgical procedure requires a lot of thought. Fortunately, breast augmentation is a very safe procedure and I would say that patients are usually very happy they elected to have this done. I think that one has to do their research. They should learn about the types of implants available, the incisions used, the pocket position, and the potential risks, to name a few. Just as important, the patient has to find a doctor and his staff that she feels comfortable with and feels will give her a good result and proper preoperative and postoperative care. This may require a patient to meet with several doctors before deciding on a specific surgeon.

Both saline breast implants and silicone breast implants are excellent products. The FDA has approved the use of silicone gel filled implants in adults 22 years of age or older. There are advantages and disadvantages to both. Saline implants can be placed through a smaller incision than silicone implants because they are inflated inside the breast pocket. Minor volume discrepancies between the two breasts can be adjusted by filling the saline implants with different volumes of fluid, but yet using the same shaped implants. If a saline implant deflates, the sterile saline water gets absorbed and it is usually easy to tell that it deflated. However, saline implants are usually more palpable than silicone filled implants. Saline implants also have a fill valve which can be palpable. Silicone implants are pre-filled and do not have a palpable fill valve. Silicone implant volumes cannot be adjusted in the operating room because they cannot be opened during the procedure to be filled. Most patients feel that silicone implants feel more natural.

Breast augmentation surgery is a fairly straight forward procedure for most patients. Routinely, these are performed as an outpatient in my accredited office based surgery facility. Patients go home in a loose fitting zip up sports bra and often can go back to light duty fairly quickly after surgery. I most commonly perform breast augmentation using the submuscular pocket using the dual plane approach. In most cases, especially in very thin patients, I think that this adds more soft tissue coverage over the implant especially in the upper pole. Most patients can go back to light aerobics within about three to four weeks. Often they can do vigorous exercise like sit-ups and weight lifting within six to eight weeks. It is important to be seen in follow-up before moving forward with the various activities.

Commonly patients present to my office often after having children, requesting that their breasts be restored to their pre-pregnancy appearance. Many of these patients have involution or loss of breast volume. In those patients that do not have breast sagging, implants are an excellent choice. One fallacy is that many patients believe that if breast augmentation is performed in this type of scenario, it somehow lifts the breasts as well. In general, implants do not lift the breasts to any significant degree. Implants only restore lost volume. If a patient needs a lift, then implants alone will not accomplish this. But, sometimes fewer incisions are required for a breast lift. In other words, a patient who has a breast augmentation will perhaps get a nice result with a lollipop type incision instead of an inverted T or anchor type incision. Or if they were a candidate for a lollipop type lift without implants, with implants they may only need a circumareola lift.

As of November 17, 2006, the FDA has approved the use of silicone gel implants for patients that desire a breast augmentation. Patients have to be at least 22 years old to receive the gel implants for primary breast augmentation. So now along with the saline-filled implants, there are even more implant choices for patients desiring a breast augmentation.

There are many different ways to perform breast augmentation. The incision can be placed in the armpit (transaxillary), under the breast (inframammary), at the border of the areola and breast skin (periareolar), through the umbilicus (transumbilical), and even through an abdominoplasty incision when performing an abdominoplasty (transabdominal). Each location has its pros and cons.

Many patients will have some change in sensation after the surgery; this is often due to swelling that usually resolves after four to six weeks. However, about 15% of patients will have a change in sensation that persists after one year.

There have been no scientific studies in my opinion to definitively prove that incision location affects sensation. However, many plastic surgeons postulate that sensory changes may be related to the size of the implant used. That is, the larger the implant the more likely sensation will change. This may be due to the stretching of the tissues in the pocket that needs to accommodate the larger implants, and therefore stretching the sensory nerves may affect the function of these nerves.

I always tell prospective patients who email me this request that I cannot predict the exact size of the cup in a bra because bras do not always match up to the volumes of implants. Furthermore, the implants appear differently on different patients. A good guesstimate is to perform a BAGGY TEST once the potential range of volumes is discussed with me during consultation.

A baggy test is a test that I sometimes have patients do at home after discussing breast implant options to nail down a volume that they might be happy with for breast augmentation. Basically, patients get a plastic bag that can twist-tie. I have them fill up the bag with either rice or water. They fill a measuring cup to the suggested volume and then pour that volume in the bag and tie it. They then put on a loose fitting bra, preferably one that they want to fill, and then add the filled bag into the bra cup. Then they put a tight t-shirt on over the bra to see if they like that volume. Changing the volume as suggested in specific increments may help in the decision making process for the final implant volume. It produces a rough estimate and seems to work for my patients in most cases.

Today we have so many options for breast augmentation. Not only do we have saline, or sterile water filled implants, but we also have silicone filled implants both with cohesive gel and form stable silicone gel. Furthermore, we have different surfaces covering the implants. This includes both smooth and textured surfaces. There are also different implant profiles including low profile, moderate profile, high profile, and ultrahigh profile. Besides round implants, we also have available biodimensional or anatomic shaped implants. This variety gives patients many different options to choose from.

Anatomical shaped implants or biodimensional implants have a tear drop shape to them. In the U.S. they are all textured. These are great implants for some patients. The main disadvantage in my opinion is that they can rotate a bit and may not stay in the orientation that they were placed in the operating room.

TABA stands for Trans-Abdominal Breast Augmentation. This is an approach using the abdominoplasty incision to gain access for insertion of breast implants. I have used this technique in patients that underwent a mommy makeover. A mommy makeover usually refers to a procedure that a woman has after completing having children. It usually entails a combination of a breast procedure and a tummy tuck. A TABA is great for a patient that wants a tummy tuck and a breast augmentation at the same time and they do not have breast ptosis (sagging.) A small pocket is created, extending up to each breast from the upper aspect of the elevated abdominal flap. Once this is completed, the implants are placed into the pocket. The advantage is that there are no incisions on or near the breast. Saline or silicone breast implants can be placed through this approach.

TUBA stands for TransUmbilical Breast Augmentation. This was a very popular procedure when only saline implants were available on the market. A small incision is made in the umbilicus and a tube is maneuvered into the space up to the breast fold. Using an endoscope to visualize the pocket position, an implant is then inserted. Because a small tunnel is used, saline implants are the only ones inserted this way. Disadvantages include the limited access afforded by this technique which limits the ability to treat bleeding, or allow for precise pocket dissection. Silicone implants cannot be placed through this approach.

In general, if you need a breast lift then you need a lift. Implants provide more volume and will not raise the nipple to any great degree. Sometimes a patient can have a circumareolar lift in which an incision is made around the border of the areola to raise it higher on the breast mound. If the patient needs more of a lift, then a vertical or inverted T type closure can be performed. It really depends upon the patient’s anatomy.

Choosing the right breast implant for an individual is a complex decision process. First, patient’s goals are of prime importance. What size do they want? What shape are they looking for? What type of projection are they looking for? etc… But a very important factor is the patient’s overall anatomy. How wide is the chest wall? What volume of breast tissue do they have? How loose is the skin? How thick is the skin? to name a few. Once all this information is taken into consideration, a range of implants are selected for possible use. I will often have the patients perform a \u201cbaggy test\u201d at home to see if they like the volume chosen. Then in the operating room, I will have several different sizes and shapes of implants to choose from based upon all these factors, and then use the information obtained during consultation and what I see in the operating room to make the final decision.

Choosing the right breast implant profile is best performed in person during a physical exam and a discussion of the patient’s goals. Implants used to come in only one shape and with increasing volume the implant got wider and had more projection. Now for any volume there are several different shapes to choose from. We have moderate profile implants, moderate plus implants, high profile implants, and ultrahigh profile implants. So as the profile changes, and for the same volume, the base width of the implant becomes narrower and the projection becomes greater.

Rippling of an implant happens more commonly in thinner patients that do not have a lot of soft tissue coverage over the breast implant. For patients that have subglandular breast implants, this can happen along any surface of the implant. With implants under the muscle, the upper pole has more soft tissue coverage because it not only is covered by the skin and breast gland, but in addition it is covered by the pectoralis muscle. Patients with submuscular implants tend to have rippling along the lower pole where the muscle does not cover the implant. Treating rippling depends upon the breast implant pocket position. If the implant is subglandular, then perhaps placing them submuscular can help. In addition, the lower pole will still need more coverage. This can be achieved with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM), most commonly Strattice. This matrix adds another layer of coverage over the implant and incorporates into the surrounding soft tissue. Some surgeons may offer fat injection as another alternative to thicken the soft tissue surrounding the implants to decrease the rippling.

A double bubble is a breast deformity that occurs when an implant either is too wide for the native breast mound and does not drape appropriately over the implant, or when the implant drifts down below the natural inframammary fold. For the former situation, one can have the lower pole of the breast \u201copened up\u201d by scoring the gland so that it re-drapes better over the implant, or placing a smaller implant in the pocket that matches the breast base diameter better. This also may require a capsule repair to accommodate the smaller implant. For the latter situation, if the implant drifts down below the natural fold, it may be because the inframammary fold was undermined during the original surgical approach or the implant pushed through the weak inframammary fold. Either way, a capsulorrhaphy or pocket repair will need to be performed. Sometimes a smaller implant is recommended as well to be replaced into the pocket. Some surgeons will also use an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) to provide extra support for the pocket repair.

The body forms a natural barrier around implants of all types. Usually this pocket stays pliable and soft for most patients. However, for some, the capsule around the implant can become tight. One theory regarding the cause is that there is a low level bacterial count in the pocket, leading to a biofilm layer that causes the capsule to tighten. This tightening is called a capsular contracture. Rates of capsular contracture are reported to be between 5-15%, and there is a high risk of recurrence once it develops and is treated. Treatment of a capsular contracture usually entails removing the implant, removing as much of the capsule as possible, and then replacing with a new implant. There have been some reports that suggest placing the implant in a submuscular pocket may decrease the risk of contracture. In addition, some reports suggest that using an acellular dermal matrix (ADM), like Strattice may help reduce the risk of recurrence.

Symmastia is a condition in which the natural central depression over the sternum that separates the two breasts is violated and the area lifts up to give the appearance of one very large breast. This happens as a result of implant malposition, more common when implants are placed in a subglandular pocket. Usually in a submuscular pocket, the implant is \u201cblocked\u201d or restricted from moving more medially because of the natural insertion of the pectoralis muscle on to the sternum. Symmastia may develop in individuals when the surgeon attempts to produce more cleavage for the patient. Treatment of symmastia often includes a capsulorrhaphy or pocket repair. Some surgeons may add an acellular dermal matrix (ADM), such as Strattice to reinforce the pocket repair. If the implant is in the subglandular plane, placing it in a submuscular plane may be beneficial.

Breast implants can have a smooth outer surface or a textured outer surface. The rationale for the textured outer surface is that it potentially could help minimize the risk of developing a capsular contracture. The truth is that the literature does not support this concept in many studies, especially when the implants are placed in a submuscular pocket. Furthermore, textured implants tend to not move as freely in the pocket as a smooth implant.

Malposition of a breast implant can entail a lot of different concepts including lateralization, medialization leading to symmastia, and bottoming out inferiorly. In all cases the pocket has to be adjusted so that these problems do not recur. Sometimes the creation of a new pocket is necessary and is called a neo-subpectoral pocket. Many times the old pocket can be used, and repair or tightening of the pocket can be performed which is called a capsulorrhaphy. In some instances, an acellular dermal matrix (ADM), such as Strattice is used to reinforce the pocket repair.

Cleavage is defined by the space between the two breasts that lies over the sternum. The patient’s anatomy dictates the amount of cleavage they can have. Wider implants may help improve the cleavage. Some surgeons will place the implants in a subglandular plane to improve the cleavage. When the pocket is made too aggressively medially, then symmastia may develop. When implants are placed under the muscle, the cleavage is limited to the insertion point of the overlying pectoralis muscle, and so the amount of cleavage achieved can be limited.

Gummy implants are form-stable implants. They differ from the more common cohesive gel implants in that they are firmer. The form-stable implants maintain the structure of the gel if the implant ruptures. The analogy used is the consistency is like jello. If the implant is cut in half, the gel does not ooze. The form-stable implants available in the U.S. are all textured and have a Bio-Dimensional shape. Because of their somewhat lack of pliability, a larger incision is required to insert them as opposed to the incision size used for the cohesive gel implants or the saline implants.

Gummy bear implants are implants that are made of a semi-solid type of silicone that remains intact when the implant is cut in half. Natrelle implants are a proprietary name of a gummy type silicone implant that is produced by Allergan. As of November 17, 2006, the FDA has approved the use of silicone gel implants for patients that desire a breast augmentation. Patients have to be at least 22 years old to receive the gel implants for primary breast augmentation. So now along with the saline-filled implants, there are even more implant choices for patients desiring a breast augmentation.